Teen Out of The Box

In assessing conversations, statements such as “X is the best drummer in the world!” may not be well-supported, as this reflects a subjective preference rather than an established fact. The evaluation of drummers is complex and continually changes, with no comprehensive, universally accepted list or method for comparison. Criteria for determining who is "the best" can vary widely and may depend on individual perspectives. 

Talking Time: Please note the following considerations.

When engaging in one-on-one conversations, if one person consistently speaks more than half of the time, it can lead to an imbalanced exchange. Speaking approximately 75% of the time may discourage others from participating. Focusing on taking interest in others, sharing speaking opportunities, asking relevant questions, and listening actively contributes to a more equitable conversation. 

“Muhammad is aggressive.”

On its own, communication specialists have told me they interpret this statement as an “opinion”. 

To me, this is labelling a person based on a situation and may be too much a generalization to be factual. 

How about this statement/assertion: 

“When I was a passenger in Muhammad’s vehicle, he was aggressive.”

To me, we’re giving some context, but now labelling Muhammad as an “aggressive driver.” We’re not there yet.

More specifics please, to provide context for the assertion:

“Muhammad and I were late for a meeting. He was driving slowly. I asked him to hurry up and he started driving aggressively.”